Ramat v. California Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered January 2, 1918, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on a fire insurance policy.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The plaintiffs, Eamat and wife, seek recovery from the defendant insurance company upon a fire insurance policy covering their household furniture. Trial in the superior court for King county sitting with a jury resulted in verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of $500, the full amount for which the policy was issued. The defendant has appealed to this court.
A judgment was rendered upon a verdict in respondent’s favor in the superior court upon a former trial therein, which was reversed upon appeal to this court (Ramat v. California Ins. Co., 95 Wash. 571, 164 Pac. 219),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robbins v. Milwaukee Mechanics InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Gregerson v. Phenix Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Ramat v. California Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Boskovich v. Union Assurance Society, Ltd.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Workman v. Royal Exchange AssuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
- Robinson v. Silver Lake Railway & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931