Legal Opinion
Sattler v. City of New York Commission on Human Rights
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Peter P. Rosato, J.
By way of order to show cause and accompanying verified petition and supporting affidavit, petitioner, a dentist, seeks (1) to vacate a determination of probable cause entered by respondent against petitioner by way of written notice of probable cause determination dated February 17, 1989; and (2) to be granted a writ of prohibition dismissing an amended complaint dated February 16, 1989 and entitled McCoury v Sattler, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, i.e., on the ground that petitioner’s dental office, which office is located in Manhattan, does…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sarkisian Bros. v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Pace College v. Commission on Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. New York City Human Rights CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Rudow v. New York City Commission on Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1984
- Village of Monticello v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sattler v. City of New York Commission on Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1989