Legal Opinion

Gainey v. Gainey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 2008No. COA07-1573PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

The Guilford County Sheriff (“the Sheriff’) contends that the trial court erred when it granted defendant’s motion for the return of weapons surrendered pursuant to a domestic violence protective order because defendant is prohibited from owning or possessing any firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922. We reverse and remand. .

I. Factual Background

On 4 December 2006 plaintiff filed a complaint pursuant to Chapter 50B seeking a domestic violence protective order (“DVPO”). The complaint alleged that on 3 December 2006 defendant “grabbed [plaintiff] by [the] neck and dug into [her]…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Esther Bein and William BeinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Sessler v. MarshCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Sessler v. MarshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Stachlowski v. StachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. McDevitt v. StacyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Underwood v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API