Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Hudak v. Uhl

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 1, 1937PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COOPER, District Judge.

The relator obtained a writ of habeas corpus requiring the respondents to show by what authority he was detained in custody.

The petition for the writ showed that he was detained by virtue of a warrant of deportation directing his deportation to his native country, Poland.

The petition also alleged that such deportation was unlawful and deprived the relator of his alleged right to proceed voluntarily to a country of his choice.

That country apparently is Canada, from which he unlawfully entered the United States on September 26, 1933, as appears by the return to the writ.

Th…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fong Yue Ting v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Bugajewitz v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Zakonaite v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. United States Ex Rel. Karamian v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. Ex Parte SaadiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Mazur v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  2. Moraitis v. DelanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1942
  3. United States ex rel. Von Kleczkowski v. WatkinsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  4. United States v. Holland-America LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  5. Soewapadji v. WixonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API