Legal Opinion · Dissent

Margaret Ann Alford v. Cornelius J. Noonan

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 16, 1958No. 19-2819Published

1Dissent

CLARK, Chief Judge (dissenting).

I would affirm the judgment below, based as it is on a jury verdict rendered upon persuasive evidence in accordance with a charge accepting the realities of modern highway traffic in the United States for Vermont as well.

Appellant Noonan employed Slock-bower, the nonappealing co-defendant and driver of appellant’s automobile at the time of the accident, to drive him and his wife on a vacation trip in Vermont. This employment took Slockbower away from his home in New Jersey. He had no regular hours and was required to hold himself ready to drive for Noonan at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Wichita Royalty Co. v. City National Bank of Wichita FallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Pomerantz v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951
  5. Ronan v. J. G. Turnbull Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API