Legal Opinion

Harrill v. Parkinson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 16, 1910No. 635PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Court, Wagoner County j John II. King, Judge. Action by James Parkinson against Thomas O. Harrill. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

Defendant in error brought this action to recover from plaintiff in error the sum of $762.50, alleged to be the balance due on a certain promissory note executed by plaintiff in error to defendant in error and the interest thereon, and for a decree foreclosing his lien upon certain stock in an oil com-, pany pledged to secure the payment of the note. The facts of the case that are uncontroverted are, in substance, as follows: On May the 18, 1905, plaintiff in error executed his promissory note to defendant in error for the sum of $1,000, payable November the 18, 1905, bearing interest from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Bird v. WebberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brissey v. TrotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Edwards v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Kelley v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Collins Cotton Co. v. Wooten-Burton Sales Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. St. L. S. F. R. Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API