Legal Opinion

Romer v. American Export Lines, Inc.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 4, 1952PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGarrison, J.

Upon trial of the issues in this case, the defendant tendered the issue of law that the Municipal Court has no jurisdiction of this action for maintenance and cure. Appropriate motions to dismiss at the end of plaintiff’s case, at the end of the entire case, and again after verdict, were made, and this court has reserved decision with the acquiescence of counsel for both sides.

The defendant does not contend that none of the State courts have jurisdiction of an action for maintenance and cure (it concedes that State courts of general jurisdiction have), but it contends that the jurisdiction of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Pache v. OppenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Halkin v. HumeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1924
  4. Wielar v. WatzkyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
  5. George B. Holman & Co. v. GrahamCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Swiss Air Transport Co. v. BennAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API