United States v. Houghton
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BREWSTER, District Judge.
Over two years after his conviction and sentence in this case, Houghton has filed a motion that he be furnished with a transcript of the proceedings herein without cost to him. The Court is of the opinion that the motion should be denied.
The conviction was on a plea of guilty to Count 1 of a two count indictment charging Houghton with wiretapping a telephone in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2511. Penalty was assessed at 5 years imprisonment, to begin on the date he was sentenced. 1
Following two abortive attempts to get the case to trial after Houghton pleaded not…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Florencio SepeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Clyde McGarry v. Jack Fogliani, Warden, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Jack Aaron Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- James Oliver Harless, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Escobar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Gill v. NeavesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1987