Legal Opinion

United States v. Houghton

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 21, 1975No. CR. 4-936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BREWSTER, District Judge.

Over two years after his conviction and sentence in this case, Houghton has filed a motion that he be furnished with a transcript of the proceedings herein without cost to him. The Court is of the opinion that the motion should be denied.

The conviction was on a plea of guilty to Count 1 of a two count indictment charging Houghton with wiretapping a telephone in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2511. Penalty was assessed at 5 years imprisonment, to begin on the date he was sentenced. 1

Following two abortive attempts to get the case to trial after Houghton pleaded not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Florencio SepeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Clyde McGarry v. Jack Fogliani, Warden, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Jack Aaron Walker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. James Oliver Harless, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Escobar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  2. Gill v. NeavesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API