Escobar v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
On March 17, 1993, Victor Escobar filed his pro se “Defendant’s Motion for Reproduction of Documents” by which he seeks, without charge, copies of trial records, including “any and all trial transcripts pertaining to this cause,” for use in preparing an application for post-conviction habeas corpus relief. The sole authority Escobar cites for the relief he seeks is rule 53(j)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
As a matter of constitutional equal protection, an indigent criminal defendant is entitled to a free transcript of prior proceedings when that transcript is needed for an…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Britt v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Woodrow McKay ShoafCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by114 opinions
- In Re Coronado, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- Eubanks v. Mullin, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)1995
- In Re Strickhausen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Ex Parte Russell Olin Beard, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2015
- Aaron Patrick Alaniz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.