Ross Products, Inc. v. Newman
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
On this motion to remand, the only substantial issue is presented by defendant, Premier Products’, contention that a claim founded solely on allegations of unfair competition is one arising under the Lanham Trade Mark Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1051-1127, and, therefore, within the jurisdiction of the federal courts, even absent diversity of citizenship.
That the law was precisely the opposite prior to the effective date of the Lanham Act cannot be disputed. Magic Foam Sales Corp. v. Mystic Foam Corp., 6 Cir. 1948, 167 F.2d 88. Indeed, the federal courts have long been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stauffer v. ExleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Treasure Imports, Inc. v. Henry Amdur & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Magic Foam Sales Corp. v. Mystic Foam Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Auto. Ass'n (Incorporated) v. SpiegelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Dad's Root Beer Co. v. Doc's Beverages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Royal Lace Paper Works, Inc. And E. B. Mott Company v. Pest-Guard Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Old Reading Brewery, Inc. v. Lebanon Valley Brewing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- Haeger Potteries, Inc. v. Gilner PotteriesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.