Legal Opinion

O'Donovan v. City of Somerville

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 23, 1996No. 95-P-1249PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

When O’Donovan, a Somerville firefighter, was injured in the performance of his duty, the city refused to grant his request for leave without loss of pay under G. L. c. 41, § 11 IF. The basis for the refusal was that, as previously scheduled and advised, O’Donovan was laid off from work the day after he sustained his injury. O’Donovan then brought this action under G. L. c. 231 A, seeking a determination of his right to pay and benefits from the city. Concluding that the plaintiff was entitled to pay until such time as the doctor designated by the city determined he could return to light duty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Wormstead v. Town Manager of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Chartrand v. RileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  4. DiGloria v. Chief of Police of MethuenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  5. Eyssi v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Ware v. Town of HardwickMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  2. Becker v. Town of NewburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API