Legal Opinion

Prunte' v. Universal Music Group, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 29, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2006-0480Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) ROBERT R. PRUNTÉ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 06-0480 (PLF) ) UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) OPINION Plaintiff Robert R. Prunté alleges that approximately 45 named defendants have infringed his copyright in numerous songs that he wrote and produced. He seeks to recover damages pursuant to the Copyright Act,

17 U.S.C. §§ 101

et seq., for direct and contributory copyright violations. Of the many defendants currently…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API