Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Farley

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1988No. Docket 95953PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, P.J.

Defendants appeal the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary disposition. Plaintiff filed suit against defendants for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendants moved for summary disposition for failure to state a claim under MCR 2.116(C)(8), arguing that plaintiff’s complaint failed to allege facts indicating that defendants’ conduct was extreme and outrageous. The trial court denied defendants’ motion for summary disposition. We affirm.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges the following facts. Defendant Michigan Mutual is an insurer obligated to pay workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Ledsinger v. BurmeisterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Warren v. June's Mobile Home Village & Sales, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Margita v. Diamond Mortgage Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Velmer v. Baraga Area SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. David G. Mroz v. T. Darrell LeeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Gibbs v. Voith Industrial Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  5. Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API