Legal Opinion

Thompson v. North Star Muskrat Farm, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 1, 1931No. 28,402PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiff had a verdict for the amount of a commission claimed under a supposed express contract for the sale of defendant’s real estate. The latter appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

Defendant is a Minnesota corporation. The property involved, formerly owned by it, is the Loon Lake Muskrat Eanch in Beltrami county. It was sold to Randall Brothers by contract under date of June 20, 1929, for a price which, for present purposes, may be considered the equivalent of $18,000. The documentary foundation of plaintiff’s claim is an informal written…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bloomingdale v. CushmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Wait v. Nashua Armory Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
  3. Johnson v. OgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. John Gund Brewing Co. v. TourtelotteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Minnesota Kicks, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
  2. Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Powell v. MVE Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  4. Mosell Realty Corp. v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  5. Losinski v. American Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API