Legal Opinion
New Jersey Transit Corp. v. Harsco Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 7, 2007No. 06-3507PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARTH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires us to decide if, in a contract governed by Article 2 of New Jersey’s Uniform Commercial Code (“U.C.C.”), see N.J. Stat. Ann. § 12A:2-101 et seq., appellant New Jersey Transit Corporation (“Transit”) can rely on the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose to recover damages, where the contract’s one-year express warranty had expired at the time of the loss. The District Court, exercising diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, granted summary judgment in favor of appellee Harsco Corporation (“Harsco”) and all…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Barbara E. Horn, of the Estate of Daniel Ray Horn, Deceased v. Thoratec CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Larry Lasko v. Scott DodrillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Cheryl Slater v. Susquehanna CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Tameru v. W-Franklin, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Baker Hughes Proc & Pipel Svc v. UE Compression, LCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Benedict v. Hankook Tire Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.