Legal Opinion

United States v. Millard-Grasshorn

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 27, 2010No. 09-2825PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Chief Judge.

James Leon Millard-Grasshorn was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). After an evidentiary hearing, the district court 1 found Millard-Grasshorn mentally incompetent and committed him to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) for a determination whether his competency can be restored. MillardGrasshorn appeals, arguing the court erred in committing him under § 4241(d). We affirm.

At any time before sentencing, either party to a federal criminal prosecution may file a motion for a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Dale E. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. United States v. Kyulle Jay StrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. John Leonard Ecker, A/K/A Leonard HoffeckerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. John EckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. McKithenSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. United States v. Steven EvansCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Kevin DalastaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Osborne HenriquesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Millard-Grasshorn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API