Legal Opinion

Baker v. John Morrell & Co.

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided March 17, 2003No. C01-4003-MWBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL, AND MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

[[Image here]]

Title VII “is ... neither a general civility code nor a statute making actionable the ordinary tribulations of the workplace.” 1 The defendant in this sex discrimination case argued that this was precisely what the plaintiff was attempting to do. The jury rejected that contention, and following an exceptionally well-tried employment discrimination jury trial, the court is called…

2Cases cited161 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gustafson v. Genesco, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2018
  2. Zeigler v. Fisher-Price, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API