Legal Opinion
Timm v. McCartney
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1938No. Civ. 11564PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County entered upon a verdict for plaintiff on the first cause of action contained in her amended complaint by which she sought to recover the amount paid by her to defendant under the terms of a contract for the purchase of real property. Plaintiff’s first cause of action, which is the only one before us on this appeal, sets forth that by reason of the affirmance by the Supreme Court of a judgment in the case of McCartney v. Campbell et al., 216 Cal. 715 [16 Pac. (2d) 729] (hereinafter referred to as action No. 129-142),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Craig v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- McCartney v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Silva v. Reclamation District No. 1001California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Timm v. McCartneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Flynn v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Bitters v. Networks Electronic Corp. (In Re Networks Electronic Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Standard Oil Co. v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Kimball v. KimballIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Weaver v. Shell CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.