Legal Opinion

State v. Radcliffe

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1993No. 16215PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HEEN, J.

In this appeal by Defendant-Appellant Mark Radcliffe (Defendant), we consider only his conviction for the offenses of Robbery in the First Degree, Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-840(1)(b)(ii) (1985) (Count I), and Assault in the Third Degree (Count III). HRS § 707-712(1)(a) (1985). The State concedes that the trial court erred in denying Defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal on Count II of the indictment, Possession, Use or Threat to Use a Deadly Weapon in the Commission of a Crime. HRS § 134 — 51(b) (Supp. 1992). Accordingly, we reverse Defendant’s…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. State v. FoxHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Miller A. Dixon v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kerns v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. FermHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. State v. DiazHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Naluai v. NaluaiHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. YamamotoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API