Legal Opinion

Puget Sound Nav. Co. v. Puget Sound Tug & Barge Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 9, 1948No. 15058PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

Statement of Facts.

Action in personam in admiralty for loss and damage sustained by libelant as the result of the collision of libelant’s barges with a bridge pier when the barges were being towed by respondent’s tug.

Respondent answered affirmatively that libelant promised to procure insurance to protect respondent on account of the liability here in question.

Libelant excepted to the sufficiency of this affirmative defense, contending the admiralty court had no jurisdiction to consider it.

Decision

The Court feels that subsequent review and further study of the questions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armour & Co. v. Fort Morgan Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Kenny Scow Corp. v. Zalud Marine Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koch-Ellis Marine Contractors, Inc., Individually and as of the Barge Ke-14 v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Stanley T. Scott& Co., Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Makah Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Stanley T. Scott& Co., Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Makah Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API