Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stanley T. Scott& Co., Inc., a Washington Corporation v. Makah Development Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 8, 1974No. 71-2983Published

1DissentWallace, Circuit Judge

(dissenting) :

The majority has needlessly expanded federal jurisdiction to encompass a suit on a contract to procure marine insurance, a cause of action which has never been within the admiralty jurisdiction. While a policy of marine insurance is a maritime contract, Insurance Co. v. Dunham, 78 U.S. (11 Wall.) 1, 20 L.Ed. 90 (1870), a contract to procure marine insurance is not any more maritime than a contract to build or to sell a ship, actions which are also not within admiralty jurisdiction.

Because of the difference between marine insurance and other forms of insurance, a suit on a marine…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Andrews v. Essex Fire & Marine Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1822
  3. David Crystal, Inc. v. Cunard Steam-Ship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  4. Marquardt v. FrenchDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1893
  5. St. Louis Shipbuilding & Steel Company v. Petroleum Barge Company, Inc., and R. v. Warner, D/B/A R. v. Warner Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API