Legal Opinion
Harding University v. Consulting Services Group, L.P.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 10, 1999No. 98 C 1762PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
On February 11, 1999, Magistrate Judge Morton Denlow recommended that defendant’s Consulting Services Group et al. motion for Sanctions [95-1] be denied. No objections have been received. I have reviewed Judge Denlow’s well reasoned report & recommendation. I agree with both its reasoning and conclusions, The motion [95-1] is therefor denied.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Rule 11 motions do not bring out the best in lawyers. This case is no excep tion. Unfortunately, the Court expects more from counsel in their dealings with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pavelic & LeFlore v. Marvel Entertainment Group, Div. of Cadence Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stephen Michael Ridder v. City of Springfield, Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Robert N. Corley and Vera M. Corley v. Rosewood Care Center, Inc. Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- VanDanacker v. Main Motor Sales Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
- Caldwell v. CummingsWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Long v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- In Re Jazz Photo Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- In re MeltzerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.