Legal Opinion
Mooney v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1905No. Civ. No. 33PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. D. McFadzean, J. W. Davis, and C. L. Russell, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The plaintiff obtained a writ of review from the superior court of Tulare county for the purpose of annulling an order of the supervisors of said county directing that Liberty school district shall become, and ordering the same to be made, a part of the Tulare high school district for high school purposes. Upon a return to the writ and a hearing thereon, the court rendered its judgment, annulling such order and all proceedings thereunder. Prom this judgment the respondents to the writ have appealed.
The return to the writ, which comprises the record before the board, shows that, upon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Russell v. Town of LoyaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Board of Education v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Zilisch v. AuerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Hayes v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907