Legal Opinion

Municipality of Anchorage v. Tatco, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1989No. S-2697PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether Alaska’s Little Miller Act, AS 36.25.010-36.25.025, applies to a contract for the delivery of “cover material” to a solid refuse landfill operated by the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA). The four appellees seek to recover from MOA for materials appel-lees supplied to TATCO, Inc. (“Tatco”) in the course of Tatco’s performance of a landfill contract with MOA. 1 Appellees’ claims are based on MOA’s failure to require Tatco to post a payment bond as allegedly required by statute and/or contract and MOA’s failure to require Tatco to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McGee Steel Co. v. State Ex Rel. McDonald Industries Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. United Bonding Insurance Company v. CastleAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. White v. Neal & Sons, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pete Lien & Sons, Inc. v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. GeoTek Alaska, Inc. v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Pete Lien & SonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API