Municipality of Anchorage v. Tatco, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
This case presents the question of whether Alaska’s Little Miller Act, AS 36.25.010-36.25.025, applies to a contract for the delivery of “cover material” to a solid refuse landfill operated by the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA). The four appellees seek to recover from MOA for materials appel-lees supplied to TATCO, Inc. (“Tatco”) in the course of Tatco’s performance of a landfill contract with MOA. 1 Appellees’ claims are based on MOA’s failure to require Tatco to post a payment bond as allegedly required by statute and/or contract and MOA’s failure to require Tatco to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Peterson v. WirumAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Day v. a & G Construction Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- McGee Steel Co. v. State Ex Rel. McDonald Industries Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
- United Bonding Insurance Company v. CastleAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. White v. Neal & Sons, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pete Lien & Sons, Inc. v. City of PierreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- GeoTek Alaska, Inc. v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Pete Lien & SonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998