Legal Opinion
In re Henatsch
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 13, 1962No. Patent Appeal No. 6716PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
The Board of Appeals, in its opinion of March 7, 1960, affirmed the rejection by the examiner of claims 11 and 15-21, *955inclusive, of appellant’s application Ser. No. 362,783 filed June 19, 1953, on a sidewalk canopy. The rejection is based on the following references:
Hohorst 405,475 June 18, 1889
Greenwald 405,549 June 18, 1889
Firguson 1,796,564 Mar. 17, 1931
Pollard (British) 482,911 Apr. 7, 1938
Upon applicant’s petition for rehearing, this decision was adhered to.
The issue presented is: Do claims 11 and 15-21, inclusive, particularly point out and distinctly claim, as required by…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RM Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- In re LundbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- In re AllattCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- In re TibonyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Cole Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- RCA Corp. v. Applied Digital Data System, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- In Re C.A. QueenerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In Re C.A. QueenerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986