Legal Opinion

Burnham v. Smith

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL PROM COUNT? COURT, DANE COUNT?. The facts of this case are sufficiently stated ia the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Paine, J.

This was an appeal from an order refusing a new trial. The action was brought to foreclose a mortgage, and an answer was filed, the nature of which does not appear in the papers brought here by the appeal, but which, it seems, was treated as forming an issue. A few days before the case was likely to be reached, in its *259order for trial, the defendant, desiring to be absent a short time, his counsel obtained a verbal stipulation from the counsel of the plaintiff, that the cause should not be pressed for trial before his return. The defendant himself seemed to understand…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gaillard v. SmartNew York Supreme Court · 1826
  2. Wager v. StickleNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Craig v. FanningNew York Supreme Court · 1852

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Illinois Steel Co. v. WarrasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Adelmeyer v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  3. Oostburg State Bank v. United Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  4. Stilson v. RankinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Sargent v. KindredNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API