Legal Opinion

Deighton v. City Council of Colorado Springs

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1995No. 93CA1155PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

Plaintiff, Darryl Deighton, d/b/a First Amendment Bookstore, appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, the City Council of Colorado Springs and its included members in their official capacity (collectively City Council). On alternative theories of state law and federal constitutional law, plaintiff claimed that defendants’ temporary moratoria on new adult uses within the city were invalid. Because we agree that the moratoria were improperly enacted, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

The parties stipulated to the following facts.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. City of Park RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  2. Cross v. SoderbeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Inganamort v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. Harrell v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Sommerfeld v. City of SewardNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. City of CentralColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Deighton v. City Council of Colorado SpringsColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Deighton v. CITY COUNCIL OF COLO. SPRINGSColorado Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API