Legal Opinion
Doe v. Byzantine Catholic Diocese of Parma
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 13, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01424Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 John BC Doe, No. CV-21-01424-PHX-JJT 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Byzantine Catholic Diocese of Parma, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 At issue is the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53, MSJ), supported by a 16 Statement of Facts (Doc. 54, DSOF), filed by Defendant Byzantine Catholic Diocese of 17 Parma aka The Eparchy of Parma (the “Eparchy”). Plaintiff John BC Doe filed a Response 18 (Doc. 55, Resp.) supported by a Statement of Facts (Doc. 56, PSOF), and the Eparchy filed 19 a Reply (Doc. 57, Reply)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Taylor v. ListCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Torres v. City of MaderaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.