Legal Opinion
Medlin Construction Group, Ltd. v. Harvey
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 1, 2006No. 2005-1514PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Medlin Construction Group, Ltd. (“Med-lin”) appeals from the summary judgment decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (the “Board”), Medlin Constr. Group, Ltd., A.S.B.C.A. No. 54,-772, 05-1 BCA ¶ 32,939, which held that Medlin is not entitled to recover certain increased costs incurred in performing Contract No. DACA63-02-C-0015 (the “Contract”) with the Army. Because we find that Medlin’s interpretation is the only reasonable interpretation that gives meaning to all of the Contract provisions, we reverse and remand.
I. BACKGROUND
On July 29, 2002, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McAbee Construction, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Lockheed Martin Ir Imaging Systems, Inc. v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- United States v. General Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- American Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Shell Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Canpro Investments, Ltd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Dynetics, Inc. and Subsidiaries v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Frans Nooren Afdichtingssystemen B v. v. Stopaq Amcorr Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- IBM Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.