Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Dugan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1917No. 7658Published

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County; J. C. Robberts, Judge. Action by B. McLaughlin against Anson Dugan. There was a judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The subject-mlatter of this appeal is the right of posssession to and ownership of a bird dog. The plaintiff in error sued in the lower court for its possession, and lost. He has appealed and urges two reasons why this case should be reversed: (1) That the court committed error in permitting evidence to be introduced here under the pleadings to establish ownership in a third party. (2) That he had been in possession of the dog for two years, and under section 4657, subd. 3, Rev. Laws 1910, this action was barred, and that the force and effect of the statute gave to him the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Payne v. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  2. Yandle v. CraneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
  3. Francis v. Guaranty State Bank of TexolaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. White v. GemenySupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  5. Street v. MorganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API