Legal Opinion

Boynton v. Church

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 8, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Proceedings in. certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

Upon entering the decree in the district court in Boynton v. Salinger, 147 Iowa, 537, the defendant as presiding judge caused to be inserted the following clause: “Process upon this decree is to be suspended, and no sale is to take place pending appeal, provided that appeal be perfected within thirty days after the entry of this decree.” Thereafter a motion to expunge the clause from the decree was overruled. It is contended in this proceeding that in inserting said clause the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction. The effedt of the order was upon ajipeal to supersede the judgment without…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re EpleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  2. Boynton v. SalingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Winter v. CoulthardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Denmead v. ParkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Carroll v. ReddingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barry v. Black Hawk County District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. CastleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Higgins v. HigginsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Tuttle v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Des Moines & Central Iowa Railroad v. PowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API