Legal Opinion

Kin Gibson v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2003No. 02-5473PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Kin Gibson was terminated from his job with the City of Louisville in 1998. Gibson sued the City, arguing that he was fired in retaliation for requesting leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). The jury returned a verdict in favor of the City. Gibson now appeals, contending that the district court’s instruction to the jury contained an inaccurate statement of the law. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.

I. BACKGROUND

Gibson claimed that he was terminated in retaliation for requesting family medical leave to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Regina R. King v. Preferred Technical GroupCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cornelius Wright v. Murray Guard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Dawn White v. Columbus Metropolitan Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Pamela Richardson v. Monitronics International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  4. Geraldine Burley v. Jeffery GagackiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  5. Colburn v. Parker Hannifin/Nichols Portland DivisionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API