Legal Opinion

Tidd v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 14, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated April 29, 1994, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denied the plaintiff’s cross motion to compel the defendant to comply with certain discovery demands.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Court of Appeals has explicitly stated that "[t]he New York City Transit Authority owes no duty to protect a person on its premises from assault by a third person, absent facts estabishing a special relationship…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weiner v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Crosland v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rios v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Oppenheim v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Besedina v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Turton v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Turton v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API