State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services v. Michelle P
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARNEY, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A court must have jurisdiction to rule on a case. The superior court dismissed a Child in Need of Aid (CINA) petition because it believed it no longer had jurisdiction over the case after the disposition order granting the Office of Children's Services (OCS) custody of the child had expired. We hold that jurisdiction over a CINA case is distinct from the grant of custody or supervision to OCS in a disposition order and that it derives from the child's status as a child in need of aid. We therefore reverse the superior court's order dismissing the petition and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- L.G. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. Native Village of NunapitchukAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dara S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Amy S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Taryn M. v. State of Alaska, Department of Family & Community Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Tuluksak Native Community v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- In re Dependency of G.J.A.Washington Supreme Court · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.