Legal Opinion
Fulghum v. United Parcel Service, Inc
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1985No. 73092, (Calendar No. 23)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.
We agree with the result suggested by the minority, but for the reasons stated by the Court of Appeals in its disposition of this case.
Where a collective-bargaining agreement provides a method by which disputes are to be resolved, there is a strong policy in favor of deference to that method of resolution. Hines v Anchor Motor Freight, Inc, 424 US 554; 96 S Ct 1048; 47 L Ed 2d 231 (1976). This policy can only be effectuated "if the means chosen by the parties for settlement of their differences under a collective bargaining agreement is given full play.” United Steelworkers of America v…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Renny v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Espinoza v. ThomasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Ryherd v. General Cable Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Lettis v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Stiles v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.