Riggle v. Jackson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiff sued for damages for the alleged wrongful attachments of personal property used by him in drilling an oil-well. The defendants are the sheriff, his bondsman, and the attaching plaintiff. The cause was tried without a jury and resulted in a judgment for all defendants. The plaintiff appeals on a bill of exceptions.
Behr and White entered into a contract with plaintiff wherein the latter agreed to drill a well for oil and the former agreed to furnish plaintiff a derrick, engine and other necessary equipment to be used in the work. As a part of the agreement Behr and White undertook to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Drinkwater v. . DinsmoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. MalletteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Maher v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hurd v. BarnhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by2 opinions
- Henderson v. Security Nat. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Henderson v. Security National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977