Legal Opinion

McKesson and Robbins, Inc. v. Charles Pfizer & Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 1964No. Civ. A. 36342PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, District Judge.

This action was instituted on August 11, 1964 by the filing of a complaint for declaratory judgment by McKesson and Robbins, Inc. (McKesson) against Charles Pfizer & Co., Inc. (Pfizer) to have Pfizer’s tetracycline patent declared invalid. On August 14, 1964 McKesson amended its complaint to allege a cause of action against Pfizer and American Cyanamid Co. (Cyanamid) for treble damages and injunctive relief under the authority of Sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 15, 26) as a result of violations by the defendants of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Lorain Journal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
  2. Milsen Company, a Corporation v. The Southland Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  3. Denver Rockets v. All-Pro Management, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1971
  4. Interphoto Corporation v. Minolta CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Company v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API