Legal Opinion

Keller v.Foleron

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 15, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by the defendants from- a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, third district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, P. J.

The plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendants — principal and surety — on a bond given in the Magistrate’s Court of the city of Hew York for the seventh district, for forty-nine dollars, seven weekly payments due on said bond, and the defendants have appealed.

*535The bond was given after the conviction of Foleron, the principal, as a disorderly person in failing to support his wife and children.

The magistrate, under the provisions of section 685 of the charter of the Greater New York (Laws of 1897, chap. 378), therein applicable to such cases, required Foleron to pay $7 weekly to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. . PettitNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. People v. Brady, New York Court of Session, Albany County1895
  3. People ex rel. Keller v. ShradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  4. Mayor of New York v. EhrsamNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. HorwitzNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1912
  2. Tully v. StoutAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API