Burton v. American Bridge Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
There is evidence in the record which presented a question of fact for the jury whether at the time of the accident the crane operator, Kemp, was the servant of the defendant American Bridge Company. It was error to hold as a matter of law that he was the ad hoc employee of the Arthur A. Johnson Co. (Bartolomeo v. Bennett Contr. Co., 245 N. Y. 66; Ramsey v. New York Central R. R. Co., 269 N. Y. 219; Kristiansen v. Wagner’s Steel Erectors, Inc., 295 N. Y. 668). The judgments should be reversed, the verdict reinstated and judgment directed to be entered thereon in favor of plaintiff, with costs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bartolomeo v. Charles Bennett Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Ramsey v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Kristiansen v. Wagner's Steel Erectors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hill v. Erdle Perforating Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- O'Brien v. Garden Way Manufacturing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Vathy v. Rupp Rental Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- Dicenzo v. New York Shovel & Crane Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Ranney v. Habern Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.