Armes v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATZ, District Judge.
This case involves a challenge by antiabortion protestors to the City of Philadelphia’s enforcement of the Pennsylvania defiant trespass statute. Plaintiffs ask this Court for money damages, a declaratory judgment that their arrests were unconstitutional and an injunction preventing their arrest for similar conduct in the future. Because I find that the plaintiffs’ right to express their deeply felt views stops at the private property line of the abortion clinic, I will deny plaintiffs’ requests. 1
The stipulated facts are as follows:
1.The Northeast…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Adderley v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Greer v. SpockSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- City of Cincinnati v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. McMonagleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Ryans v. GreshamDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1998
- United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 72 v. Borough of DunmoreDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.