Legal Opinion

The People v. Marcus D. Hogan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 2016No. 18Published

1Opinion of the Court

================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 18 The People &c., Respondent, v. Marcus D. Hogan, Appellant. Shirley A. Gorman, for appellant. Robert J. Shoemaker, for respondent. STEIN, J.: Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the drug factory presumption of Penal Law § 220.25 was properly considered by the factfinder. In addition, defendant argues that the decision regarding whether to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API