The People v. Marcus D. Hogan
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 18 The People &c., Respondent, v. Marcus D. Hogan, Appellant. Shirley A. Gorman, for appellant. Robert J. Shoemaker, for respondent. STEIN, J.: Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that the drug factory presumption of Penal Law § 220.25 was properly considered by the factfinder. In addition, defendant argues that the decision regarding whether to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. StultzNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.