Truax v. . Slater
New York Court of Appeals
The plaintiff is the assignee, under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, of George Silver. The assignment was executed and delivered on the 16th day of June, 1879. The plaintiff claims that after the assignment to him, Silver assigned certain accounts due him from several persons to the defendant, and that the defendant collected and received upon such accounts about $600; and this action was brought to have such assignment declared fraudulent, null and void,…
Read the full summary
The plaintiff is the assignee, under a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, of George Silver. The assignment was executed and delivered on the 16th day of June, 1879. The plaintiff claims that after the assignment to him, Silver assigned certain accounts due him from several persons to the defendant, and that the defendant collected and received upon such accounts about $600; and this action was brought to have such assignment declared fraudulent, null and void, and to compel payment by the defendant to the plaintiff of •the amount so collected. The controversy of fact upon the…
1Opinion of the Court
*633 Earl, J.,
reads- for affirmance.
All concur, except Miller, J., not voting. Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by17 opinions
- The BarnstableSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lent v. . ShearNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Smith v. GoetheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Pfeffer v. KlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Commercial Bank of Rochester v. BoltonNew York Supreme Court · 1895
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.