Legal Opinion

Marks v. Lyerla

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1991No. B054559PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE (S. J.), P. J.

Appellant Marilyn Marks argues that she is entitled to bring this wrongful death action for the alleged murder of her granddaughter by the child’s mother. We disagree in this case of first impression.

Appellant is only a potential heir of the decedent under the California intestate succession scheme. The alleged murderer is the decedent’s sole heir and, as such, is the only person statutorily authorized to bring an action for the decedent’s wrongful death.

Facts

On July 27, 1989, 15-month-old Kajsa Lyerla (the decedent) drowned in a fish pond on the property of her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Steed v. Imperial AirlinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Evans v. ShanklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Mayo v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Medrano v. Kern County Sheriff's OfficerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  2. Stennett v. Miller, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API