John Wright Register v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
*449WHITAKER, Judge.
This is plaintiff’s second suit for active duty pay and retired pay. Our former decision is reported in 128 F.Supp. 750, 131 Ct.Cl. 98.
Insofar as plaintiff seeks the active duty and retired pay of a lieutenant, his claim is plainly barred by the doctrine of res judicata for the period covered by our former judgment. We decided in the former case that plaintiff was entitled to the active duty and retired pay of a lieutenant, junior grade. That was a final judgment on that question and it cannot be litigated again. See 28 U.S.C. § 2517.
It is true that in our former decision we…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Abarr v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
- Register v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ernest F. Boruski, Jr. v. United States GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Gargoyles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Kutz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- John Wright Register v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- John Wright Register v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960