Legal Opinion

Mallack v. Local 805, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 29, 1988No. 87 CIV. 5966 (PKL)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge:

This case involves claims of several laid-off employees of Panasonic Company, a division of Matsushita Electric Corporation of America (“the Employer” or “Panasonic”) who worked in the consumer parts and service department of Panasonic’s Secaucus, New Jersey facility. Plaintiffs have sued their representative union, Local 805, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (“Local 805” or “the Union”) under sections 101(a)(1) and (2) of the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act, (LMRDA), 29 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API