Legal Opinion

Rogne v. City of Catoosa

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided February 21, 2025No. 4:24-cv-00307Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JOHN ROGNE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 24-cv-00307-SH ) CITY OF CATOOSA, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff brought this lawsuit on June 28, 2024, asserting a Fifth Amendment takings claim and seeking a declaration that Defendant improperly exercised jurisdiction over his land.1 Defendant now moves to dismiss the takings claim, arguing it is barred by issue preclusion and the applicable statute of limitations. Defendant also moves to dismiss the declaratory judgment action for lack of subject-matter…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API