Legal Opinion

Collier v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 1945No. Appeal, 29PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

In the opinion of the Superior Court in this Workmen’s Compensation case appears the following statement: “It is plain to us that on the record before us, claimant’s average weekly wage is to be determined under sub-section (d) [of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 520, Section 1, 77 P.S. 582]. . . . But claimant’s complete employment record, at least for the year immediately before the accident, should have been introduced into evidence.”

At the argument we directed that a stipulation be filed by the respective parties showing what the appellant’s weekly wages…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nortim, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Arthur Shelley Trucking & Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API