Collier v. Kaufmann & Baer Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
In the opinion of the Superior Court in this Workmen’s Compensation case appears the following statement: “It is plain to us that on the record before us, claimant’s average weekly wage is to be determined under sub-section (d) [of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 520, Section 1, 77 P.S. 582]. . . . But claimant’s complete employment record, at least for the year immediately before the accident, should have been introduced into evidence.”
At the argument we directed that a stipulation be filed by the respective parties showing what the appellant’s weekly wages…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Nortim, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Arthur Shelley Trucking & Insurance Co. of North America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988