Legal Opinion

Nevada Highway Patrol Ass'n v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public Safety

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1991No. 21369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*548OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellants brought an action in the state district court asserting respondent’s compensation policy — which provides highway patrol officers compensatory time off in lieu of overtime pay— violates the Fair Labor Standards Act. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, 216(b). The matter was removed to the United States District Court for the District of Nevada where summary judgment was granted in respondents’ favor.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a decision on March 28, 1990, reversing the grant of summary judgment and remanding the case back to the district court with…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chase v. RogersNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Local 2238 of the American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. StrattonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Renown Health, Inc. v. VanderfordNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Nevada Highway Patrol Ass'n v. State, Department of Motor Vehicles & Public SafetyNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Renown Health, Inc. v. VanderfordNevada Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API