Legal Opinion

Pimental v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided December 30, 2002No. CIV. 01-292-MPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MCAULIFFE, District Judge.

Mary Ann Pimental brings this action against her former employer, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic (“DHC”), seeking damages for alleged violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et. seq. She also advances state law claims for breach of contract and wrongful termination, over which she says the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction. DHC denies any wrongdoing and moves for summary judgment as to all of plaintiffs claims. Plaintiff objects. 1

Standard of Review

When ruling on a party’s motion for summary judgment, the court must “view…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Beulah Smith, Gerald Griggs-Ryan v. Richard ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Torres-Alman v. Verizon Wireless Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
  2. McNamara v. Tourneau, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  3. Michnovez v. Blair, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
  4. Turner v. Sullivan University Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2006
  5. Stephens v. Thomas Pub. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API