Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robert E. Kennedy v. Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2004No. 01-55246Published

1DissentO’Scannlain, Circuit Judge

This case represents a triumph of law-yering from the bench. While I share some of the court’s evident sympathy for the defendant — whose third strike resulted from the sale of less than one-tenth of one gram of a legal substance to an undercover officer1 — I respectfully dissent from its decision to step into counsel’s shoes and tango its way around the deference we owe to state courts as coordinate expositors of federal law.

I

There is no dispute that Kennedy was entitled to some portion of the transcript from his first trial on these charges. See generally Britt v. North Carolina, 404 U.S.…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API